Physical properties of chemical elements and table according to the charges of atomic nuclei.

 

classification of all known chemical elements

Dear Sirs!
 

I give some explanations to my work. The atomic nucleus model was developed in order to clarify the adjusted table of elements. Between lutetium and hafnium, the difference in atomic masses does not reach four units, while new elements with atomic numbers 72-75 are placed there. How can nucleons be packed in a nucleus so that it is drip and shell and with the necessary number of neutrons? Such a nucleus is obtained if alpha particles are placed in the surface layer, and only neutrons are inside the nucleus. In this case, in new chemical elements with numbers 72-75 inside the nucleus, the neutron can be replaced by a proton, and therefore the atomic mass of the elements between lutetium and hafnium will vary slightly. The model was obtained by considering the structure of the nuclei of atoms from heavy to light.
 

TABLE OF CHEMICAL ELEMENTS CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE CHARGES OF ATOMIC NUCLEI.
 

This article presents views on the classification of all known chemical elements, those fundamental components that make up the Earth and the entire Universe.
 

The innovation of this work lies in the fact that in the table of elements, built according to Mendeleev's law and Van den Bruck's rule, new chemical elements with atomic numbers 72-75 and 108-111 were supposedly identified, and it was also shown that heavy elements, starting from hafnium, the nuclei of atoms contain more protons than is generally accepted.
 

A model of the atomic nucleus has been developed, which explains the ratio of the number of protons to the number of neutrons. It is shown why there are more neutrons in the nucleus than protons. All table cells are filled.
 

If this table takes place, then I would like to name the groups of elements with numbers 72-75 and 108-111, the islands of Filipenka H.R.
 

Probably James Chadwick made a mistake when measuring the charges of atomic nuclei. More precisely, not an error in measurements, but in the fact that he agreed with the periodic table and the result obtained for platinum 77.6 was interpreted as a nucleus charge equal to 78, according to the table. For copper, the result was 29.3 - more than true by 0.3, for silver 46.3 is already less than true by 0.7, and for platinum it is less than "true" by only 0.6. The decrease is due to the screening of protons by each other during measurements. Therefore, for platinum with a charge of 78, the result should have been less than that obtained, or in other words, the platinum atom has a nuclear charge greater than 78 and equal to 82.
 

Let's build a model of the atomic nucleus. We know that there are protons and neutrons in the nucleus. In each subsequent element, there is more proton and several neutrons. Why? The volume grows faster than the surface. With alpha radiation, helium nuclei of approximately the same energies are emitted from the nucleus. Placing helium nuclei in the surface layer of the atomic nucleus, we obtain with some accuracy that the remaining neutrons are inside the nucleus. And the question is, can and when is the proton inside the nucleus. According to Mendeleev's law and Brook's rule, as well as the resulting model of the nucleus, a table of elements is developed.
physical table of elements
 

Platinum is numbered 82 in this table. Protons begin to be located inside the nucleus from 72 to 75 elements. Items not yet open. All cells are filled in the table.
 

DI Mendeleev does not have a table, but a complex chemical structure. Lanthanides and actinides, which should be arranged vertically according to their chemical properties, are located horizontally under the table in a "home" way. Brook's rule includes the periodic law and is more general.
 

Please repeat the experiment of James Chadwick in measuring the nuclear charge of the platinum atom. The charges of the copper and silver nuclei are beyond doubt. But according to this table of elements, built both according to Mendeleev's law and also according to van Brook's rule, starting with hafnium, the charges of nuclei can be 4 units more than is accepted today with the same mass. To set the regimes at nuclear power plants, it is probably important to know the true charge of the uranium nucleus.
 

Dmitry Ivanovich intuitively felt that there should be a table of elements, and not a complex structure, like his, but he probably did not have enough knowledge of the structure of the atom and the nucleus of an atom. Therefore, lanthanides and actinides are located horizontally. The rule of Van den Bruck, an amateur nuclear physics, turned out to be more general than the periodicity of Mendeleev and the calculations of quantum mechanics. A table, by definition, must have all the cells filled in according to a law or rule, and if you do not fill in any, there must be an explanation of this by this law or rule.
 

Therefore, the cells of the physical table were filled as at http://physicaltable.blogspot.com and unknown items numbered 72-75 and 108-111 appeared. Which demanded an explanation. When reviewing the results of measuring the charges of nuclei or atomic numbers by James Chadwick, I noticed that the charge of the platinum nucleus is rather equal not to 78, but tends to 82, which corresponds to the developed table. For almost 30 years I have been raising the issue of repeating measurements of the charges of atomic nuclei, since uranium probably has a higher charge than is accepted, but it is used at nuclear power plants.
 

Lithium and beryllium, depending on temperature, change the crystal lattice in much the same way as scandium and titanium. Which says about the correctness of our table of chemical elements.
 

Bibliographic list: 1.G.G. Filipenko. "Suspicious" areas in periodic table, "Technology and Science", No4, Moscow, 1990.
 

2.G.G. Filipenko. A model of the atomic nucleus is proposed, "Engineer", No4, Moscow, 1991.
 

3. Papers of Independent Authors 2005 Issue 1, pp. 172-183.
 

4.Physical table of elements. http://physicaltable.blogspot.com
 

for those who did not understand ... there is an error in the periodic table ... I do not know who made it by placing hafnium next to lanthanum ... hafnium according to atomic weight and the following elements should be in the table one line below ... then continuing with lanthanides after lanthanum fill the cells and we get that in the remaining 4 cells there are some not yet discovered new elements 72-75, presumably with the chemical properties of lutetium. Since the electrons corresponding to protons 72-75 will be distributed below the outer electrons of lutetium. Quantum mechanics does not take into account the structure and size of nuclei, so its conclusions are correct as long as the nucleus can be taken as a point.
 

Everything about the same applies to elements 108-111.
who placed hafnium next to lanthanum and when ...
 

hafnium and the elements following them should be a line below according to changes in atomic weights in the table of elements ... in the table of Mendeleev's times, after lanthanum, there is cerium... and why?

  I can only assume that the seventy-second electron of the 72nd element should be located at lower levels compared to the outer ones, since the seventy-second proton replaces the neutron inside the nucleus. Based on my constructions. Therefore, the chemical properties of 72-75 elements will be the same as that of lutetium. In hafnium and in the elements following it, the nuclear charge increases by 4 units. It is interesting to look at the uranium decay curve into fragments. Uranium92 decays into barium and krypton. From uranium96 it is possible to derive the same barium and zirconium or lanthanum and yttrium, which lie closer to the maxima of the curve than barium and krypton or lanthanum and bromine ... the same ash, but more consistent with the distribution curve of fragments with the same chemical composition ... OF THESE EXAMPLES I CHECKED THE CORRECT CHARGE OF THE NUCLEUS OF A URANIUM ATOM equal to 96 

   I have the elements distributed in the long-period version of the table according to the charges of the nuclei so as to fill all the cells of the table

And how to distribute the isotopes of atoms according to the charge of the nuclei in the table.

isotopes could be placed to the right and left of the element in a table that would turn from a flat one into a volumetric one ... on the right, for example, with a larger number of neutrons and on the left with a smaller one ... and a certain body would be obtained from all elements and their isotopes ... like -So maybe some properties could be found for a system of all chemical elements ... 

 Henadzi Filipenka 

Dmitry Ivanovich built a table according to atomic weight, and he was right, because. atomic weight characterized the element completely, so to speak. This characteristic implicitly included both the periodicity and the charge of the nucleus. But someone collected the lanthanides after him in one line and placed them below the table. And Mendeleev had cerium after lanthanum. Now after lanthanum there is hafnium, and this is a gross mistake because, according to the atomic weight, it, hafnium, should be located on the line below. Elements 72-75 and 108-111 are omitted, starting with hafnium, the charges of the nuclei have changed.

After Mendeleev, the era of quantum mechanics began and its periodicity fit beautifully for many elements. Then it turned out that the main feature of the element is the charge of the nucleus. Before you is a table built according to the charges of the nuclei of atoms.

 

Has the periodic table of elements been proven to be absolutely correct, or correct with some exceptions?

for example, if we build a table according to the charges of the nuclei of atoms, then we get for the elements following after lutetium the charges of the nuclei increased by 4 units ... 72-75 and 108-111 elements not yet discovered.